Fourth, many non-profit and for-profit boards are put together in the light of tasks that need to be done. So an accountant is recruited for the financial task, a carpenter for facilities management, a public relations person for handling media, etceteras. While Paul says that different spiritual gifts are like different body parts, this is brought up for the church as a whole rather than for a session. In fact, notice that in Romans 12:8 there is the gift of leadership. The session is built around the leadership task not around specific organizational tasks.
Fifth, the gift of leadership prompts me to suggest this differentiation for nominating committees: needed to qualify, required to play, must have to win. Needed to qualify is that the committee should not consider unless this minimum is in the candidate’s life. Required to play is that the committee should not consider this person seriously unless these additional qualities are present. Must have to win refers to those qualities which would lead a nominating committee to make a candidate a finalist. I would suggest that being a Christian or being nice does not qualify a person for consideration. The person rather must be, in addition to being a Christian, growing spiritually and involved regularly in the life of the congregation and ministry to the world. To play, the requirements would be that he or she is balanced, is leading in the church somewhere somehow, attends, gives, and has vision. To win a place on the final slate he or she must have a spiritual gift for leading, be generous of spirit (this is a sign of grace and faith operating in a person’s life), and be confirmed by the Spirit to the group in prayer.
Staff members, their spouses, and the spouses of current elders are not eligible. On occasion, someone from the nominating committee itself is suggested. The issue here is whether the committee can, after having that person recluse him or herself from the discussion, still have that person re-enter and in the voting time be truly turned down. The committee will have to decide about this should it come up.
Sixth, sometimes it comes across to me in organizations and in the PCUSA that we should be following a quota system. We need a young person, a person from the women’s ministries, a person who is very denominational and another who is not, and so on. I don’t subscribe to that as our reality. What I see in scripture is a priority on the quality of spiritual maturity. After that, I see in scripture also, that we are to seek balance in terms of gender, age, ethnicity, and other socio-economic factors. I do not believe that spiritual maturity or the gift of spiritual leadership is limited by gender or age or race or economics.
Seventh, beware of people with low self-esteem, a need for prominence or power, and a stingy-ness of heart. Not that these are not true of all of us from time to time but these conditions as prevailing in a person’s make-up leads to competitiveness, criticalness, and a “tightness” that are harmful to the well-being of the church. And, pay attention to any inner concerns you may have regarding a candidate’s moral integrity.
Sometimes someone will nominate a person with the thought that this will help them become involved or mature spiritually. They should already be at that point.
Look around at who’s doing what. Most of the time spiritually mature people are not un-involved wall flowers. No, they are already showing love and doing stuff. Sometimes that makes them look busy and we don’t want to burden them. Well, a lot of time busy people know how to get stuff done. And a lot of time what’s being asked of them is more strategic than what they are doing and they should trade the less strategic contribution for the more. And let’s err on the side of asking them and letting them answer for them rather than us answer for them.