If a custodian has been employed by a church for twenty
years, and if he or she has been given yearly cost-of-living increases, his or
her salary could be a good percent of the personnel budget (especially, if the
church is small). Bring in a new pastor
with a fresh seminary degree and it’s conceivable that the new pastor’s salary
is pretty close to the “tenured” custodian.
Someone could argue, with reasonableness, that the custodian’s strategic
value to the organization is high. Who
else is going to turn on the furnace on cold mornings and chilled parishioners
are no good, right? But when we talk
about the weightiness of decisions for the organization’s rise or fall, the
issues of confidentiality, the interface with the public, the connection with
the key mission of the organization, the number of dollars managed, … we can
get a sense of how important a position is to an organization, apart from who is in the position or how
long the post has been filled. The
higher the importance, the more pay there should be. The lower, the less. Have you weighted the positions in your
organization by the seriousness and strategic value?
No comments:
Post a Comment